Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Pilot City Health Center

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1976No. 45633PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The employer and insurer seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board. They challenge the board’s award of retraining benefits and denial of their petition to take additional testimony. For the reasons discussed below, we remand to the Workers’ Compensation Board.

The employee sustained a personal injury to her back that arose out of and in the course of her employment as a nursing assistant on November 15,1971. On January 8, 1974, after several periods of hospitalization and three unsuccessful attempts to return to work for the employer, she was certified for retraining as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holland v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 332Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Crown Cork & SealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. MacInnes v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Mee v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Betts v. M. I. L. Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API