Legal Opinion

Tauszig v. Tauszig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order staying and enjoining defendant from further prosecuting or proceeding to trial of his action for separation reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Under the circumstances here disclosed the order was not justified. (Thorne v. Thorne, 203 App. Div. 786, 787; Belasco Co. v. Klaw, 98 id. 74, 75; North Central Realty Co. v. Blackman, 145 id. 199; Grammer v. Greenbaum, 146 id. 3; Indestructible Metal P. Co., Inc., v. Summergrade, 197 id. 199.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thorne v. ThorneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Beuren v. Van BeurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. DobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. DobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930