Legal Opinion
Jablonsky-Urso v. Urso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*712Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court properly granted that branch of the father’s motion which was to dismiss her petition for custody of the parties’ son for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Domestic Relations Law § 75-a (7) defines a child’s home state as “the state in which a child lived with a parent . . . for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding” (see Matter of Navarrete v Wyatt, 52 AD3d 836 [2008]). Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, “[h]ome state jurisdiction is paramount…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hasbrouck v. HasbrouckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Patton v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Hall v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Navarrete v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Pastore v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- Malik v. FharaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Agueda v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Chester HH. v. Angela GG.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Agueda v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Malik v. FharaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012