Legal Opinion

Birenberg v. Razgunas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1935No. Docket No. 94, Calendar No. 38,448Published

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Defendant holds a mortgage on plaintiff’s property on which $2,350 was due and unpaid May 1, 1933. Birenberg, who is not personally liable because he is a subsequent grantee of one who did not assume and agree to pay the mortgage debt, paid Razgunas on that day $82.25 for interest to date, and $1,700 on principal, receiving a receipt for $2,100 on principal and an agreement to extend the balance of $250 for 1 year and 11 months. Defendant, shortly thereafter prematurely began foreclosure in chancery resulting in a decree dismissing his bill and $218 taxed costs which by stipulation was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. IrwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Louder v. BurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. People ex rel. Zeeland Brick Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Central Steel & Wire Co. v. FarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API