Legal Opinion

State v. Garner

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 16, 1986No. Nos. 343; 1644PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES S. GETTY, Judge.

The primary issue to be decided in this appeal by the State, is whether the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County properly concluded that the instant prosecutions were barred by the doctrine of double jeopardy. We conclude that they were not and that the trial court erred. Accordingly, we reverse.

Initially, let us isolate the form of jeopardy we are dealing with in order that our discussion not wander into other areas of double jeopardy law having no application to the factual scenario presented herein. We are concerned here with multi-count charging documents, an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. Hyman Harvey Klein, Maurice Haas, and Morris O. AlprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Blondes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. United States v. Charles L. McDaniel A/K/A "Black Danny" (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strand v. Warden of PGCCCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API