Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Brinton
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1909No. 8332PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered December 19, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the coui’t without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This action is brought to recover for the breach of a contract evidenced by the following memorandum:
“Mr. E. M. Gordon,
“Seattle, Wash.
“Dear Sir: We acknowledge herewith receipt of ninety-seven dollars and fifty cents ($97.50) being 25 per cent, payment on two Roberts motors which we agree to deliver to you for the sum of three hundred and ninety dollars ($390) f. o. b. Seattle. The complete outfit will consist of the following :
“One model P Roberts motor with two cylinders rated at 15-18 H. P. with 5-A equipment as described in catalogue and one ejector muffler.
“One model H 1%-2 H. P. with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mills v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Tripple v. LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gnash v. SaariWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Kerr v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- George v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Werth v. DavidsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931