Legal Opinion

Eppert v. Hall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1892No. 15,572PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

This was a suit hy the appellee on a note alleged to have been executed to her by the appellants, Eppert, Duey, Keys, and one William B. Tuell. Pending the litigation Tuell died, and the appellants, Tuell and Marshall, as administrators of his estate, were substituted as defendants in his stead. The defenses were non est factum and want of consideration. The appellee having recovered a verdict, a joint motion for a new trial hy all of the appellants, and a separate motion hy the administrators, were both overruled. Both rulings are assigned as error.

The first reason • assigned for a new trial…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dettman v. SumnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Smith v. GravesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Ruse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Speer v. SpeerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. White v. CrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API