Legal Opinion

Werschkull v. United California Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1978No. Civ. 40491PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

Plaintiffs, who are participants in an employees’ pension plan, brought this class action against defendant United California Bank (UCB), trustee of the plan, to obtain a judicial declaration that UCB’s 1962 amendment to the plan and its conduct pursuant to that amendment had resulted in a wrongful diversion of pension trust funds. It was also alleged that UCB had fraudulently concealed from plaintiffs the existence of the 1962 amendment and the wrongful actions taken pursuant to said amendment. In addition to declaratory relief, plaintiffs sought an accounting, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Parker v. MatthewsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Roemer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Nelson v. GauntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Berkley v. DowdsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co.California Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API