Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 2016No. CV-16-555PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJosephine Linker Hart, Associate Justice

hRay Ellis (Ray) appeals from the circuit court’s order of permanency planning for his son, C.E. In that order, the circuit court denied his motion to consider the home study regarding C.E.’s paternal uncle, Josh Ellis, and Josh Ellis’s wife, Tamara Ellis (the Ellises, or individually, Josh and Tamara). Further, the court found that the continued custody of C.E. with the Arkansas Department of Human Services (ADHS) was in C.E.’s best interest and that the goal with respect to C.E. should be changed to adoption. The court allowed the foster parents to intervene in the case. On appeal, Ray…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ponder v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Davis v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parnell v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Isbell v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Norris v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Clark v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Ellis v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API