Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Anderson v. Souza

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1952No. Sac. 6136Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SCHAUER, J.—Concurring and Dissenting.

I concur in the reversal of the judgment as to' plaintiffs Terry, Fletcher, Harrison, Baba and Wooters, and in the reversal of the part of the judgment which restrains defendants from operating the airport. I agree that the cause should be remanded for further proceedings in accord with the view that11 Contiguous property owners must to a reasonable degree yield their desired privacy to the general welfare which is contributed to by the operation of legitimate businesses. Were it not so, railroads could not operate near residences, and factories could not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delta Air Corporation v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Batcheller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  5. Crew v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API