Legal Opinion

In re Ledingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1988. He maintained an office for the practice of law in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1981.

By order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey in February 2007 (Matter of Ledingham, 189 NJ 298, 914 A2d 1288 [2007]), respondent was suspended from practice in that state for three months and until further order of that court. The order was based on a decision of the Disciplinary Review Board of the Supreme Court of New Jersey which concluded that respondent had charged an unreasonable fee, threatened his client with criminal action to collect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In the Matter of LedinghamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re WeekesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re LedinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API