Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Mutual City & Village Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Berrien. (A. J. Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

"Plaintiff insured liis house and household

furniture, clothiug and provision therein, in defendant company. The house he valued in the application at $550, insured for $400; and the personal property was valued in the policy at $400, and insured for $300. The house and a portion of its contents were destroyed by fire on the 13th or morning of the 14th of January, 1882. The officers of the company seem to have entertained the opinion that the house ■was burned by plaintiff to defraud the company, and refus. ing to pay the loss, this suit was brought upon the policy. The defendant pleaded the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Standard Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Briggs v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API