Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of New York v. Long Island Airports Limousine Service Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 18, 1983Published

1Dissent

Weiss and Levine, JJ.,

dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum by Levine, J. Levine, J. (dissenting). We are presented here with a simple and unambiguous contract in which the agreed upon reciprocal performances of the parties are clearly identified. Under the agreement, the city consented to LIALS’ operation of routes for a term of almost 10 years. In return LIALS agreed to make periodic payments based upon a percentage of its receipts. LÍALS also agreed, however, that should it continue to operate routes after the termination of the city’s contractual obligation to consent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Muzak Corp. v. Hotel Taft Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Strauss v. Long Island Sports, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Raner v. GoldbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Pettinelli Electric Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API