J.P. v. State

Appellant appeals an order entered November 9, 2000, nunc pro tunc, February 25, 1999, ordering him placed in aftercare following successful completion of level 6 commitment. We reverse.

The trial court originally ordered Appellant to level 6 commitment. Although recommended by the Department of Juvenile Justice, the trial court made no oral pronouncement of aftercare and did not order aftercare in its written order. A successor judge entered an order nunc pro tunc, correcting what was perceived to be a clerical mistake in the original disposition order. The new order revised the disposition…