Legal Opinion

McClanahan v. Medicredit

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00163Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MARTA MCCLANAHAN and JESSICA ) STINSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 3:19-cv-00163 v. ) ) MEDICREDIT, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Marta McClanahan (formerly known as Marta Stinson) and her daughter Jessica Stinson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against Medicredit, Inc. (“Medicredit”) for allegedly violating the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (“FDCPA”),

15 U.S.C. § 1692

et seq., and Tennessee law. Before the Court are two motions that are ripe for decision: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API