Legal Opinion

Moore v. Beard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 6, 1912No. 8229PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Prince, J., Hampton, March, '1911. Action by D. F. Moore against Herbert A. Beard et al. The defenses stricken out, from which order the defendant, Beard, appeals, are: “For a second defense: “This defendant alleges that for a complete determination of his rights and interests under and by virtue of the transactions referred to in the complaint, J. W. Rags-dale, J. E. Ragsdale, Bertha V. Barnes and Willie C. Blackburn are necessary parties to this action, as they own…

Read the full summary

Before Prince, J., Hampton, March, '1911. Action by D. F. Moore against Herbert A. Beard et al. The defenses stricken out, from which order the defendant, Beard, appeals, are: “For a second defense: “This defendant alleges that for a complete determination of his rights and interests under and by virtue of the transactions referred to in the complaint, J. W. Rags-dale, J. E. Ragsdale, Bertha V. Barnes and Willie C. Blackburn are necessary parties to this action, as they own interests in and under the mortgage set up in the complaint. “For a third defense: “This defendant alleges that on the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage which was given to secure the payment of a note of which the following is a copy:

“$138,780.00. Brunson, S. C., April 14, 1910.
“On or before the 15th day of February, 1911, I promise to pay to the order of D. F. Moore at Bank of Brunson, Brunson, S. C., the sum on one hundred and twenty-eight thousand seven hundred and twenty ($188,730.00) dollars, with interest on the same from the 15th day of February, 1910, at the rate of five (5) per centum per annum, payable annually, until the whole has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nathans v. SteinmeyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  2. Peake v. RenwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Diseker v. Eau Claire Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boozer v. GunterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Boozer v. GunterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API