Legal Opinion

Aram Adzhikosyan v. AT&T Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 17, 2021No. 2:21-cv-05997Unknown

1Opinion

O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 ARAM ADZHIKOSYAN, individually Case № 2:21-CV-05997-ODW (MRWx) and on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO REMAND [23] AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 14 AT&T CORP. et al., TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [24] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Aram Adzhikosyan brings this putative class action against Defendants 20 AT&T Corporation and DIRECTV, LLC alleging Defendants violated California 21 privacy laws. (See Notice of Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API