Legal Opinion

Richardson v. De Giverville

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Gf. IV. Lubke, Judge. (1) The execution of the antenuptial contract was sufficient in form to sustain it under the statute and in equity, and will be held to be good as between the parties. No objection was made to its introduction, and the rights of no third parties had intervened. Logan v. Phillips, 18 Mo. 22; Wilkinson v. Rozier, 19 Mo. 443; Lemay v. Poupenez, 35 Mo. 71 ; McClurg n.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Gf. IV. Lubke, Judge. (1) The execution of the antenuptial contract was sufficient in form to sustain it under the statute and in equity, and will be held to be good as between the parties. No objection was made to its introduction, and the rights of no third parties had intervened. Logan v. Phillips, 18 Mo. 22; Wilkinson v. Rozier, 19 Mo. 443; Lemay v. Poupenez, 35 Mo. 71 ; McClurg n. Phillips, 57 Mo. 214 ; Harrington v. Fortner, 58 Mo. 468; Elenke v. Eoeitze, 75 Mo. 239 ; 1 Pomeroy Eq. Jur., secs. 378, 380. (2) The antenuptial contract…

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Plaintiff Richardson brought this suit against Madam Be Giverville and her husband to enforce the specific performance of a written contract executed by her, while a married woman, by Mr. Bailey, her agent, for the sale of fifty acres of land in the limits of St. Louis, to the plaintiff. The petition states that Madam Be Giverville owned and held the property as her sole and. separate estate. The defendants deny this averment and say she was seized of and held the property as her general estate, subject to the marital rights of her husband, and for this reason the contract is invalid. They…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hart v. LeeteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Schafroth v. AmbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Le Breton v. MilesNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  4. Metropolitan Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Clark v. MaguireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Booth v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Hines v. HinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Girard v. GirardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Leete v. State BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Bassett v. BassettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API