Legal Opinion

Whitmore v. J. Jungman, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1911Published

Action by B. Thomas Whitmore against J. Jungman, Incorporated. On motion for further bill of particulars."

1Opinion of the Court

. GIEGERICH, J.

[1] The plaintiff appears to have complied with the requirements of the order of May 2, 1911, except those relating to particulars making up the specific items of the sum of $197.-60. As to such sum the plaintiff’s bill of particulars states:

“The specific items making up the sum of $197.60 were for railroad fare to Boston, railroad fare to Philadelphia, railroad fare to Brunswick, N. J., and railroad fare to other places, for hotel bills at above-named places, for-meals and other disbursements with prospective lenders. These sums were expended during the spring, fall, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. . McClellanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Ziadi v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Ferris v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. City of Rochester v. McDowellNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Coslow v. MawhinneyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API