Legal Opinion

Jones v. Mount Holly Water Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On defendant’s rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The defendant, a corporation, is engaged in the business of supplying water for drinking and domestic purposes in the township of Northampton, in the county of Burlington.

*107It supplied water for the purposes stated to the inhabitants of Mount Holly, among whom were the plaintiff and his family.

For the supply of water to be furnished by the defendant company to the plaintiff for his and his family’s use, the plaintiff paid the defendant company $25.90 (one year’s supply), in advance, from April 1st, 1911, to April 1st, 1912.

In January, 1912,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aronson v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Cassini v. Curtis Candy Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Hamilton v. Madison Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
  4. Safransky v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Lincoln Trust Co., Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API