Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Cunefare

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 20, 2004No. 03SC782Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Justice BENDER,

concurring in Part II.A., but dissenting to Part II.B., and dissenting in part to the judgment.

The majority affirms Cunefare's conviction for felony forgery under section 18-5-102(1)(c), C.R.S.2004, for falsely writing and *311sending, under his wife's signature, a letter to the district attorney claiming that his wife's previously alleged assault charge against him never occurred. In my view, the plain language of section 18-5-102(1)(c) is ambiguous as to whether the forgery statute encompasses such a letter within its ambit. Applying traditional rules of statutory construction to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. People v. Thoro Products Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. People v. HaganIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API