Legal Opinion

Hildebrant v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1924No. Civ. No. 4737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff sued for damages suffered by him while attempting to board a street-car operated by the defendant. The accident occurred about 9:30 P. M. on the 13th of November, 1919. Plaintiff had been a passenger on a Market Street car operated by the defendant coming east through the Twin Peaks tunnel. He obtained a transfer and alighted from said car at Market and Church Streets. He then went to the southwest corner of Market and Church Streets and there waited on the sidewalk for the Church Street or "J" car, which came west on Market Street and turned at that point to go south on Church…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davey v. Greenfield & Turner's Falls Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Ginochio v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Monroe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Fremont v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Monroe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kotronakis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Lagomarsino v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Garcia v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API