Legal Opinion

Fantony v. Fantony

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 28, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

31 N.J. Super. 14 (1954)

105 A.2d 909

JOSE GONZALEZ-FANTONY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

KATHRYN B. FANTONY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND REPUBLIC OF CUBA, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 10, 1954.

Decided May 28, 1954.

Before Judges CLAPP, FREUND and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Robert D. Grosman argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Herman W. Kapp argued the cause for the attorneys for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Kapp Brothers, attorneys; Mr. Charles Silber, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. In Re ErvingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. People ex rel. Halvey v. HalveyNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Testut v. TestutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Mayer v. MayerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Pratt v. Curt ReuterSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
  4. Fantony v. FantonyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Pratt v. ReuterSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API