Legal Opinion

Kavanagh v. . New York, Ontario and Western Railway Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 21,1921, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant. The accident occurred at about eight-forty-five p.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 21,1921, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant. The accident occurred at about eight-forty-five p. M. on December 29, 1914, at a highway grade crossing at Teaneck, N. J. Plaintiff’s intestate, Kavanagh, was employed as helper upon a brewery truck and Otto Garlisch, who was killed at the same…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mertens v. Agway, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Leiby v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Conroy v. SperlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Leiby v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API