Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Shiloe Dominique Espinoza

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 11, 2013No. 2 CA-CR 2012-0358PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ECKERSTROM, Judge:

¶ 1 The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting Shiloe Espinoza’s motion to dismiss her aggravated robbery charge on double jeopardy grounds. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶2 In 2010, Espinoza was charged with aggravated robbery. At trial, the jury was instructed that if they found her not guilty of aggravated robbery, or if they could not reach a verdict on aggravated robbery, they could consider theft of a means of transportation as a lesser-included offense.

¶ 3 During deliberation, the jury sent a note…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. State of Arizona v. Philip John MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State of Arizona v. Philip John MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API