Popel v. State

I feel it my duty to again dissent to the theory that no part of arraignment may be waived. In addition to the reasons adduced in the dissenting opinions in Burroughs v. State, 94 Neb. 519, and Wozniak v. State, 103 Neb. 749, 754, I submit the following in the hope that in time the court may adopt the views expressed in these dissents.

New trials are allowed in courts of law on statutory grounds. Section 9131, Rev. St. 1913, provides: “A new trial, after a verdict of conviction, may be granted on the application of the defendant for any of the following reasons affecting materially his…