United States v. Howell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge OHLSON,
with whom Chief Judge ERDMANN joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OVERVIEW
In various eases during the past few decades, this Court has concluded that: (a) the effect of ordering a rehearing in á case is to place the accused in the same position he or she was in before the original trial began, United States v. Von Bergen, 67 M.J. 290, 294 (C.A.A.F.2009); (b) an accused’s pay status while awaiting rehearing should be the same as if the accused had never been tried in the first place, Keys v. Cole, 31 M.J. 228, 232 (C.M.A.1990); (c) in determining whether there was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hasan v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. SimpsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.