Legal Opinion

Matter of Lindsey

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1991No. 19771PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter is before the Court following disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to the Rules Governing Discipline, SCRA 1986, 17-101 to -316 (Repl.Pamp. 1988 & Cum.Supp.1990), in which attorney Daniel R. Lindsey was found to have committed various violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, SCRA 1986, 16-101 to -805 (Repl.Pamp.1988 & Cum.Supp. 1990). We adopt the Disciplinary Board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. However, for reasons stated below, we exercise our authority pursuant to Rule 17-316(D)(3) to impose greater discipline than that which was recommended…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of AyalaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matter of OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of HartleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In re McCullochNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of LichtenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CasausNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Sutin, Thayer & Browne v. Whitener Law FirmNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API