Legal Opinion

Adams v. Hoover

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1992No. Docket 114847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacKenzie, P.J.

The parties in this case are adjoining property owners. Plaintiff filed a trespass action against defendants, claiming ownership of a strip of land running the length of the parties’ common boundary. Defendants counterclaimed, contending that they owned the disputed property. Following a bench trial, the court rejected plaintiff’s claims of title through acquiescence and adverse possession, but granted plaintiff title on the basis of a theory of repose. Defendants appeal as of right. We affirm.

The rather complicated facts and history of the case were well summarized by the trial court:

Plaintif…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Daley v. GruberMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jonkers v. Summit TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Dykes v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Steinherz v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API