Legal Opinion
City of Corona v. AMG Outdoor Advertising
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 2016No. E062869Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 1/7/16; pub. & mod. order 1/26/16 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO CITY OF CORONA, Plaintiff and Respondent, E062869 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1412756) AMG OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. OPINION et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Daniel A. Ottolia, Judge. Affirmed. Raymond N. Haynes; Cole & Loeterman and Dana M. Cole for Defendants and Appellants. Dean Derleth, City Attorney, and John D. Higginbotham, Assistant City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent. 1 I. INTRODUCTION…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.