Legal Opinion
Yates v. Medrano
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 15, 1979No. 17326PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Justice.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants, seeking to recover damages under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (Tex.B. & Comm.C. §§ 17.41-17.63). He alleged that the home sold to him by defendants had an active termite infestation and that this condition was knowingly concealed from him.
After a non-jury trial, a take nothing judgment was entered against the plaintiff and this appeal results. In three points of error the plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in failing to find “false, misleading or deceptive acts or practices” or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Seaman v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Marshall, Texas and Entex, Inc. v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co., a Division of Carrier Corporation, Defendant- Wiley College and Entex, Inc. v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co., a Division of Carrier Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Peterson Sales Co. v. Mica, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- City of Marshall v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981