Legal Opinion

United States v. Parrott

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 8, 1969No. 66 Cr. 243PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge (Orally):

As to pre-indictment delay, the investigation into the alleged criminal aspects of the defendants’ activities involved different and additional considerations and problems of evidence from those involved in the civil proceedings. The record discloses that the defendants Forrest Parrott and Donald Parrott engaged in litigious and extensive activities in the civil and administrative proceedings which delayed the investigations. In fact, in August, 1962, they failed to comply with a subpoena in the Raleigh administrative revocation proceeding,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Jack A. LustmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  4. United States v. Joseph L. SclafaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. United States v. Richard Anthony CapaldoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BisgyerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API