Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 22, 1923No. 26083PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

The district attorney concedes that the verdict and sentence in thi? *537case are null because the defendant, appellant, was tried by a jury composed of 12 members for a crime for which he should have been tried by a jury of only 5 members. Const, art. 7, § 41; State v. Thompson, 104 La. 167, 28 South. 882; State v. Beebe, 127 La. 493, 53 South. 730; State v. Reeves, 128 La. 37, 54 South. 415; State v. Desselles, 150 La. 494, 90 South. 773; State v. Stephens, 150 La. 944, 91 South. 349, 23 A. L. R. 286; State v. Hataway, 153 La. 751, 96 South. 556.

The verdict and sentence are annulled, and it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DessellesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. State v. HatawaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. State v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  5. State v. BeebeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. State v. NeddsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. State v. FlattmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API