Bowen v. Bowen
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellee’s complaint is for work and labor performed by him for the appellant. The answer of the appellant is the general denial and payment. To' the pica of payment a reply in denial was filed.
The only questions which counsel argue are those presented by the assignment based upon the ruling denying a new trial.
An affidavit was made by appellant for a change of venue from the county. ■ The court refused to grant the change, and in this did right. The affidavit ivas radically defective, for the reason that it did not specifically set forth the defence of appellant. A general statement is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CostleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Labar v. KoplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yost v. ConroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. TeetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Ætna Life Insurance v. NexsenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.