Legal Opinion

Griffith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 5, 1971No. 6 Div. 146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case reads :

“The grand jury of said county charge that, before the finding of this indictment, John Ike Griffith unlawfully did assume to act or hold himself out to the public as a person qualified to practice or carry on the calling of a lawyer subsequent to his disbarment, against the *380peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”

Upon conviction the jury assessed a fine of five hundred dollars and the court imposed a sentence at hard labor for Jefferson Count}; as additional punishment.

For present failure to pay the fine and costs or to confess…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ex Parte Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. DevoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. McFerrin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Griffith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API