Legal Opinion
State v. Cantu
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 21, 2004No. 22322-1-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 P.3d 106 (2004)
123 Wash.App. 404
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Antonio B. CANTU, Appellant.
No. 22322-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.
September 21, 2004.
Randy W. Smith, Attorney at Law, Moses Lake, WA, for Appellant.
Carole L. Highland, Attorney at Law, Grant County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Ephrata, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, A.C.J.
Unlawful entry into a residence carries with it a permissible inference of intent to commit a crime therein. Antonio Cantu challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support this inference on these facts. The State proved…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BrunsonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CantuWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Cuevas-Gaspar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.