Legal Opinion

United States v. Supervised Estate of Breidenbaugh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2003No. 19A01-0303-CV-79PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant United States of America, on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service, (collectively referred to as the "IRS") appeals the trial court's order disallowing a tax claim against the Supervised Estate of Arlo Breidenbaugh, Jr., ("Estate"). We reverse.

Issue

The IRS raises three issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred by disallowing the IRS's tax claim as being time-barred under both state and federal statutes of limitations.

Facts and Procedural History

The parties have stipulated to the following relevant facts. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Joseph v. Donover Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. In re the Estate of FeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bacigalupo v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2005
  2. Trustees of the Local 734 Bakery Drivers Health & Welfare Plan v. WolffDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API