Legal Opinion

Snook v. Snook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 13, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Logan

Affirming.

Counsel for appellant seek a reversal of the judgment of the chancellor on the ground that the evidence was such as to authorize the granting of a divorce to appellant, and that, if he is entitled to a divorce, he is entitled to have the property restored to him which was received by the appellee by reason of the marriage relations.

Appellee sued appellant for divorce. He filed an answer and counterclaim in which he sought a divorce. The chancellor denied the prayer of the petition as well as the prayer of the counterclaim. He found enough evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Coleman v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Joseph Morey v. Bernice MoreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Walter v. WalterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Municipal Acceptance Corp. v. Canole.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Daniels v. SoudersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Jarvis v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. Folta v. RiefleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. Dunning v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API