Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sadecky

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1979No. Appeal, 905 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Stephen M. Sadecky appeals to this Court from an order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas which found him guilty of violating Ordinance 2025 (Ordinance) of the Borough of Tarentum (Borough). Sadecky contends that the Ordinance imposes unconstitutional restraints upon or unlawfully discriminates against his use of his realty and that the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.

In 1974, this Court reversed the lower court’s holding that the same Ordinance was facially unconstitutional. A venire facias de novo was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re The Appeal of Neshaminy Auto Villa Ltd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Dexter v. BebenekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Talley v. Borough of TrainerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Borough of Tarentum v. SadeckyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Township of South LondonderryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. CreightonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. SnyderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Davis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Christmas v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API