Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1928No. 6369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. The municipal court of Atlanta has jurisdiction of “proceedings against intruders and tenants holding over.” Acts 1925, pp. 370, 387; Harper v. Tomblin, 127 Ga. 390 (56 S. E. 433).

*230No. 6369. April 13, 1928.

2. The issue made by the defendant’s counter-affidavit to the proceeding to eject her as a tenant at sufferance, who failed to pay rent, was tenancy or no tenancy, and the question of the plaintiff’s title was not directly involved. Patrick v. Cobb, 122 Ga. 80 (49 S. E. 806) ; Hayes Hayes, 137 Ga. 362, 365 (73 S. E. 659); Crawford v. Crawford, 139 Ga. 394 (77 S. E. 557) ; Arnold v. Water…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Huxford v. Southern Pine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Patrick v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Saffold v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Elkins v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Radcliffe v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Krasner v. CroswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Ray v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Brumfield v. Home Owners Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API