Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 6, 2018No. AC39289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBright, J.

The petitioner, Michael Hazel, appeals following the granting of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court erred when it concluded that his right to the effective assistance of counsel was not violated during his criminal trial. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts, as set forth by this court in the petitioner's direct appeal, reasonably could have been found by the jury at the petitioner's criminal trial. "At approximately 2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Bryant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Dzurenda v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hazel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API