Moore v. State

The plaintiff in error, G. D. Moore, assigns as error that the evidence preponderates against his conviction for receiving deposits in a hank, of which he was cashier, at a time when he had good reason to believe that the hank was insolvent.

The indictment charged that Moore had knowledge of the insolvency of the bank at the’ time he received the deposit in question, but the trial judge, ruling upon the motion for a new trial, has stated that the proof convinced him that the plaintiff in error did not know or believe his hank insolvent, and approved the conviction because he believed from the…