Legal Opinion

In Re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 28, 1992No. Consolidated 1-91-00100Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON COMERICA MOTIONS (1) FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY, and (2) REQUIRING EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. TO TIMELY PERFORM OBLIGATIONS OR ASSUME OR REJECT LEASE PURCHASE CONTRACT

BURTON PERLMAN, Chief Judge.

Comerica Bank (“Bank”), an indenture trustee-lender, has filed two motions. In the first, it seeks relief from automatic stay and adequate protection payments. In its second motion, Comerica invokes 11 U.S.C. § 365, seeking timely performance pursuant to § 365(d)(3) and/or the setting of a time to assume or reject pursuant to § 365(d)(2). What is involved here is a contractual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Eli Kenneth Mellor and Lisa Mellor, Debtors. Raymond G. Pistole and Raymond R. Bragg v. Eli Kenneth Mellor and Lisa MellorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re William Terrell and Tammy Terrell, Debtors. William Terrell and Tammy Terrell v. Eugene Albaugh, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re Independence Village, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  4. Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  5. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API