Legal Opinion

Simpson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1904No. 2969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOhr, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charges appellant with perjury in that he made a false affidavit before a justice of the peace charging one Oliver with having committed an assault upon him. The affidavit was the beginning of the criminal prosecution against Oliver, and was a sufficient predicate for perjury. Langford v. State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 283. It is contended the indictment is defective in that it fails to set out the affidavit in haec verba. This contention is not correct. Gabrielsky v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 428. It was not necessary under the facts to set out in full…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Urben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API