Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Henke

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1974No. 39028PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*409Spencer, J.

This action is brought in the name of Lyle C. Schmidt and Sharon Schmidt, husband and wife, plaintiffs, to recover for medical expenses incurred for personal injuries sustained by Sharon, and for property damage to plaintiffs’ 1963 vehicle. The damages resulted from a collision between vehicles operated by Lyle C. Schmidt and defendant, Terry Henke. The only issue we consider is whether or not the plaintiffs are the real parties in interest. The trial court found they were. Defendant perfected this appeal. We reverse.

Plaintiffs’ vehicle was insured with the State Farm Mutual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Scholting Ex Rel. Scholting v. AlleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jacobs Eng'g Grp. Inc. v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Jacobs Engr. Group v. ConAgra FoodsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Schweitz v. RobathamNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jelinek v. NEBRASKA NATURAL GAS COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Continental Western Insurance v. Farm Bureau InsuranceNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API