Legal Opinion
Jin-Ming Lin v. Chinatown Restaurant Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 23, 2011No. Civil Action 09-11510-GAOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
Employees of the Chinatown Restaurant Corporation (“Chinatown”) have brought suit for unpaid minimum wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and its state-law counterparts. Pending before me are several motions to compel discovery. Chinatown has moved to compel the plaintiffs’ responses to written discovery seeking information about their immigration status and has opposed the plaintiffs’ motion to compel its responses to written discovery seeking information about class members. Relying on Hoffman…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rajni J. Patel v. Quality Inn South, Manibhai Patel and Dilip Patel, Sumani Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Solis v. SCA Restaurant Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Colon v. Major Perry Street Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013