Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1975No. F-75-354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, Reginald Otto Smith, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court, Tulsa County, Case No. CRF-74-979, for the offense of Larceny of an Automobile, in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 1720. His punishment was fixed at a term of three (3) years’ imprisonment with same being suspended and from said judgment and sentence a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

The State’s first witness at trial was Michael McCollum who testified that on the evening of the 29th of April, 1974, he had left his 1971 Ford Torino…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Tillman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Fox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API