Jones v. Manier
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pickens. Tried before the Hon. S. H. Sprott . The facts of .the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Jones v. Crews, 64 Ala. 368; Alexanderv. Pollock & Co., 72 Ala. 137; 4 Stewart & Porter, 184; Tillinghast v. Johnson, 5 Ala. 514; Cleaveland v. State, 34 Ala. 254; 1 Brick. Dig. 173, § 276; Liddell v. Ghidester, 84 Ala. 508; Berringer v. Payne, 68-Ala. 154.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
In June, 1889, Manier & Son sued out process of garnishment upon a judgment previously-recovered by them against L. P. Coleman and A. H. Coleman, and Winston Jones was summoned as garnishee. The garnishment case was continued for several terms. At the spring term, 1892, the garnishee was discharged as to the defendant, L. P. Coleman. The judgment then proceeds as follows : ‘ ‘ and it having been shown to the court that the said garnishee has filed his answer in which he says he is indebted to defendant A. H. Coleman in the sum of $108.21, it is considered and it is the judgment of the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bland v. BowieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Whorley v. Memphis & Charleston RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Bostwick v. BeachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Faulks v. HeardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Chambers v. YarnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prudential Savings Bank v. LooneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Collins v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- First National Bank v. DimmickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912