Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsey

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1994No. 16622, 16623 and 16624PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Justice.

Following district court bench trials, De-curia Liana Lindsey was found guilty of three separate charges of prostitution in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1200 (Supp.1992). Lindsey filed notices of appeal in each case and we subsequently consolidated the three appeals. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the right to a jury trial attaches to prostitution offenses.

I. BACKGROUND

On three separate occasions in 1991, Lindsey was arrested and charged with committing the offense of prostitution. On April 22, 1992, Lindsey was arraigned in district court and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Muniz v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. NachtigalSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. NakataHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HanapiHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. MitchellHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. FordHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. Gomez-Lobato.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API