Legal Opinion

Culhane v. Layman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 19, 1934No. Gen. No. 8,718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dove

This is a suit filed by appellees to foreclose a trust deed executed by Arthur Layman and Anna Layman, his wife, to secure the payment of a note for the sum of $2,500, payable to the order of themselves, three years after date, with six per cent interest, payable semiannually, both principal and interest being payable at the office of the E. C. Stokburger Agency in Rockford. The original trust deed and note were dated May T9, 1924, and Ernest C. Stokburger was named as trustee therein. From a decree of foreclosure and sale rendered in favor of complainants below, appellees here, the record is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. HarpsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Kennell v. HerbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Linowiecki v. WisniewskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  4. James v. Conklin & HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. Sundquist v. RubinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  3. Feitl v. RickerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API